top of page

As You Stood By S1 Review — Netflix’s Stylish Murder Drama Trips Over Its Own Guilt

  • Writer: Niels Gys
    Niels Gys
  • Nov 7, 2025
  • 4 min read

TL;DR

A brilliant crime soufflé that collapses halfway through — still tasty, just flatter than expected.


Murder, mascara, and moral confusion — As You Stood By is half masterpiece, half migraine. When it works, it really works. When it doesn’t, you start eyeing the remote like it owes you money.



Criminal Fantasy Fulfillment

Let’s be honest: when two women decide to kill an abusive husband, we’re not here to call the police — we’re making popcorn. As You Stood By kicks off like a feminist Breaking Bad, only with more eyeliner and better lighting. For five glorious episodes, it’s deliciously wrong. You feel like cheering while holding a glass of red wine thinking, “Yes, girl, bury him behind the hydrangeas.”


Then the show remembers it’s on Netflix and starts moralizing. Suddenly, everyone’s having ethical crises mid-murder like it’s a philosophy seminar at 3 a.m. The thrill fades, replaced by long stares, piano music, and more guilt than a Catholic confessional.



Plot & Pacing

The story begins with razor precision — every scene sharp enough to cut glass. But halfway through, someone clearly swapped the script with a bag of wet noodles. The pacing goes from John Wick to The Bold and the Beautiful. The first five episodes sprint like a cheetah on espresso; the last three limp like they’ve just remembered they left the oven on.


It’s as if the writers were halfway through a murder and said, “Wait, what if we feel things?” And then spent the rest of the runtime explaining feelings no one asked for.



Characters & Performances

Our two leads — Jeon So-nee and Lee Yoo-mi — absolutely carry the show. They act with that perfect K-drama cocktail of trauma and lipstick. The chemistry between them could power a small European city.


Then there’s the husband. A man so vile you want to push him into traffic every time he breathes. The kind of guy who probably orders pineapple on pizza and tells people it’s “edgy.”


Supporting cast? Good but inconsistent. You get the sense they were all in a different show and no one told them which one.



Dialogue & Writing

The dialogue starts strong — icy, tense, calculating — the kind of lines you could tattoo on your forearm. Then it devolves into melodrama soup: “I can’t forgive myself!” “No, I can’t forgive myself!” Someone, please, hand them both a shovel and a to-do list.


By the end, you’re not sure if it’s a thriller or an extended therapy session with knives. Every conversation sounds like it’s been workshopped by someone who owns too many scented candles.



World & Atmosphere

Visually, chef’s kiss. The show is gorgeously lit — all dark hallways, glossy cityscapes, and luxury apartments where murder feels like interior design. The cinematographer clearly hates lamps but loves emotional shadows.


The aesthetic screams “expensive trauma.” It’s all perfect hair, minimalist décor, and blood that somehow lands artfully on white silk blouses. If Ikea ever sponsored revenge, this would be the result.



Direction & Style

The direction has swagger early on — confident, cinematic, beautifully cruel. But then it starts over-thinking itself. The camera begins to wobble like a man explaining NFTs, and tension turns into slow-mo montages about nothing.


You can almost hear the director muttering, “This means something deep,” while everyone else’s popcorn goes stale.



Soundtrack & Mood

The music is moody perfection. Every violin note feels like it’s judging your life choices. There’s this constant tension between sensual jazz and impending doom — like you’re at a bar that only serves revenge.


If the show had kept that rhythm, it’d be binge-worthy gold. Instead, the soundtrack outperforms the script by the finale, which is never a good sign.



Morality & Madness

Morally speaking, the show wants to have its cake, stab it, and then cry about it. It starts as a tale of justified murder — a gleeful fantasy of poetic justice — but then trips into a swamp of “what have we become?” speeches.


It’s like watching Bonnie and Clyde stop mid-getaway to discuss mindfulness. Look, we’re all for introspection, but maybe finish hiding the body first.



Rewatchability

Would you watch it again? Maybe the first half. The second half feels like that awkward party where everyone’s crying and no one knows why. You’ll rewatch the good bits, then pretend the rest never happened — like most of your relationships.



Series Longevity

Should Netflix do a Season 2? Only if someone hides all the moral lessons and doubles the crimes. Less remorse, more chaos. This series could either evolve into a brilliant revenge anthology or dissolve into “Women Cry Near Windows: The Sequel.”



FAQ

Is As You Stood By worth watching in 2025? Yes, if you like revenge served stylishly cold… and don’t mind it melting halfway through.
Does it deliver on the crime fantasy? For a while, yes — until it remembers it has feelings.
How violent are we talking? Let’s say it’s Netflix-violent: enough blood to thrill, not enough to stain your conscience.
Can men watch it too? Of course. Consider it educational material on why not to be a walking red flag.
Will there be a Season 2? Hopefully — if someone locks the writers in a room until they rediscover the word “fun.”

 
 
 

Comments


About the Editor
Naamloos3.png

I'm Niels Gys, founder and editor of CRIMENET GAZETTE. I write about crime, heist, villain, and horror games because somebody has to separate genuine criminal masterpieces from games that couldn't organize a successful mugging.

Outside the website, I'm the frontman of JETBLACK SMILE, a Belgian rock 'n' roll band that sounds like bad decisions played through loud guitars. Turns out writing about chaos, criminals, and morally questionable life choices isn't all that different from writing songs.

I started CRIMENET because too much gaming coverage feels afraid to have an opinion. Reviews become press releases, every game is "solid," and somehow everyone leaves happy except the reader.

Not here.

CRIMENET covers crime, heist, villain, and horror games, alongside the occasional film or series that earns a place in the criminal underworld. Not the heroic kind. The kind where you rob banks, build empires, betray your crew, or become the monster everyone else is trying to survive.

I don't do review scores. The internet already has enough people arguing whether a game deserves a 72 instead of a 71, like they're negotiating a hostage release over a single percentage point. I'd rather tell you what the game actually feels like to play and whether it's worth your time.

Every article is built on research, evidence, and an unhealthy intolerance for mediocre game design.

 

Strong opinions are welcome. Invented facts are not.

Think less "trusted reviewer."

More "your inside man in the digital underworld."

I'm not here to save the world.

I'm here to tell you which crimes are worth committing. 🤘

THIS WEEK
IN CRIME.

Weekly briefings on crime games, villains, heists, industry disasters, and digital chaos.

No corporate fluff. No fake hype. Just the underworld report.

© 2026 CRIMENET Gazette

Independent. Evidence-based. No paid review scores.


WHY TRUST CRIMENET?


About | Editorial Policy | Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy | Affiliate Disclosure | Terms | Corrections | Contact

bottom of page