Pax Autocratica Review: Fascism, but With More Spreadsheets
- Niels Gys
- 17 minutes ago
- 5 min read
Quick Verdict
Pax Autocratica really does let you run a nasty little authoritarian regime. You can control citizens through fear and loyalty, capture enemy soldiers, imprison and indoctrinate them, execute prisoners, sacrifice people to strengthen more useful troops, impose oppressive policies and personally lead military expeditions.
So no, the dictatorship angle isn't just marketing wearing a military hat.
The bigger question is whether all this magnificent state-sponsored bastardry actually matters enough.
Pax Autocratica has launched into Early Access with a fascinating mixture of colony management and first-person roguelite combat, but early evidence raises doubts about how deeply its political choices affect the colony. It also isn't yet clear whether the combat loop has enough variety to survive repeated expeditions.
The premise is real. The depth still has something to prove.
And because it entered Early Access on August 10, judging the finished game today would be like reviewing a restaurant while they're still installing the kitchen.
Prefer your crime with fewer ministries and considerably more cocaine? The GTA Online Weekly Grind has this week's best money, bonuses and worthwhile criminal opportunities, without requiring you to establish a totalitarian state first.
What You Actually Do in Pax Autocratica
Pax Autocratica essentially operates two shifts in the world's least employee-friendly workplace.
Back at your colony, you gather resources, construct facilities, automate production, research technologies and policies, manage citizens and prepare soldiers for war.
Then you leave the clipboard behind and personally join combat expeditions.
These switch the game into first-person shooting. You fight alongside your soldiers, gather resources, attack enemy positions, encounter increasingly dangerous opposition and collect temporary roguelite upgrades before returning home with whatever resources and unfortunate human beings you've acquired.
Those two halves feed each other.
Your colony produces the equipment and soldiers that make expeditions possible. Expeditions bring back resources and captives that make your colony stronger. Eventually you head out again.
It's Factorio's production department being repeatedly interrupted because the managing director has grabbed an assault rifle and announced that quarterly growth now requires invading Steve.
The Dictator Fantasy Is Surprisingly Real
This is where Pax Autocratica becomes considerably more interesting than another colony builder with some authoritarian posters nailed to the walls.
Captured enemies can become prisoners.
Prisoners can be indoctrinated and turned into useful members of your regime. That process can involve conversation or considerably less progressive educational techniques involving electricity.
Alternatively, you can execute them.
And because apparently simply shooting prisoners wasn't quite enough to get the Human Resources department sweating through the carpet, people can also be sacrificed to improve other soldiers.
Your existing population isn't oblivious to all this either. Systems involving fear, loyalty and morale interact with how you govern, while policies allow decisions involving surveillance, working conditions, salaries and curfews.
That's important.
Plenty of games advertise an evil route and then reveal that being evil means selecting "No, give me 300 gold" after saving the orphanage.
Pax Autocratica hands you prisoners and asks whether you'd prefer recruitment, execution or turning Kevin into a stat bonus.
That is villain gameplay.
But Does Being Evil Actually Matter?
This is the question hanging over the Early Access launch.
Having horrific buttons is not the same thing as having a deep dictatorship simulation.
Early hands-on evidence has raised concerns that the political choices don't yet create dramatically different regimes. Tyrannical and comparatively benevolent approaches can behave more like alternative progression branches than fundamentally different ways of governing.
That's potentially the game's biggest problem.
A dictatorship simulator should make oppression consequential. Cruelty should solve problems, create problems or preferably solve one problem by creating three new ones and a suspiciously empty apartment belonging to the man who complained about bread prices.
If "be nice" and "electrocute Gerald" ultimately produce roughly equivalent progression with different flavour text, then Pax Autocratica has built an impressive machine for producing atrocities without necessarily building an equally impressive reason to commit them.
Early Access gives it plenty of room to deepen that relationship.
But right now, that's the bit worth watching.
Apparently “being the bad guy” is becoming an actual genre instead of one rude dialogue option. Dig into CRIMENET's Games Where You Play as the Villain and find more games willing to hand you the moral compass, a hammer and absolutely no adult supervision.
The Shooting May Have the Opposite Problem
The FPS side appears fast, aggressive and important rather than some little minigame stapled onto the colony simulation.
That's good.
The concern is repetition.
Combat expeditions are a major source of resources and progression, which means you're expected to return to them regularly. Early assessments already suggest encounters can begin collapsing into familiar variations of clearing enemy forces despite different objectives and escalating opposition.
That creates a dangerous equation.
Colony needs resources → go shooting → return → upgrade colony → colony needs more resources → go shooting again.
When both halves remain interesting, that's a fantastic feedback loop.
When one becomes routine, you've invented commuting with firearms.
How Rough Is Early Access?
This is precisely where launch-day certainty needs to be taken outside and quietly buried.
Pax Autocratica had technical problems during development and its pre-release period, including crashes, performance issues and a recent demo update that temporarily left some players unable to load properly before a hotfix arrived.
The developers have also been actively patching performance, crashes, soldier behaviour, UI and other systems.
What isn't established yet is whether today's Early Access build is broadly stable.
Steam's initial reception is extremely positive, with roughly nine out of ten early reviews recommending it at the time of launch, but the sample is still tiny. The game has been publicly available for hours, not months.
Treat that as an encouraging pulse, not the autopsy report.
Should CRIMENET Readers Care?
Absolutely.
Pax Autocratica isn't really a crime game and there's no meaningful heist fantasy here. You're not robbing banks or building a criminal empire.
You're worse.
You're the government.
And unlike games that merely dress the player in villainous aesthetics, Pax Autocratica already supports genuinely ugly behaviour through its mechanics. Prisoners, executions, indoctrination, fear, sacrifice and authoritarian policy aren't decorative background material.
The question isn't whether you can become a bastard.
Congratulations. The Ministry has approved your application.
The question is whether Pax Autocratica eventually builds enough consequences around being a bastard to make that choice genuinely fascinating.
This Week in CRIME is CRIMENET's underworld briefing: GTA money worth stealing, new crime, villain and horror games worth knowing about, our best investigations, and industry catastrophes requiring immediate public humiliation. Get it delivered before the Ministry discovers email. Ko-fi is there too if you fancy funding the next offence.
Launch Verdict
Pax Autocratica is worth watching closely in Early Access, especially if the idea of combining colony management with first-person combat and actual tyrant gameplay makes your moral compass start making expensive grinding noises.
Its most important promise has already survived first contact with reality: you genuinely can play as the villain.
Now it needs to prove that dictatorship is more than an entertaining collection of terrible decisions.
Because giving me the ability to electrocute prisoners is certainly commitment.
Making me seriously consider why I shouldn't?
That's where things get interesting.
Pax Autocratica FAQ
Is Pax Autocratica a dictatorship simulator?
Yes, although it's also a colony-management game and first-person shooter. You can impose authoritarian policies, manage fear and loyalty, imprison enemies, indoctrinate captives and execute people who apparently failed their annual performance review.
Can you actually play as the villain in Pax Autocratica?
Yes. Villainy is mechanically supported rather than just decorative. You can rule through fear, capture prisoners, indoctrinate or execute them, and even sacrifice people to improve more useful soldiers.
Is Pax Autocratica worth playing?
It's promising, particularly for players interested in villain gameplay mixed with colony management and FPS combat. However, it's currently in Early Access, and questions remain about repetition, political depth and long-term progression.
Is Pax Autocratica finished?
No. Pax Autocratica launched into Early Access on August 10, 2026, so major systems, balance, performance and content may continue changing.
Comments