Space/Time Review: Scientists Rob Reality Itself

TL;DR

Imagine a bunch of banned academics trying to rob the universe with a screwdriver and a PowerPoint. That’s Space/Time. Loud ideas, wobbly execution, criminal intent intact.

Space/Time is messy, ambitious, occasionally brilliant, and sometimes as confused as a philosopher locked in a particle accelerator. It doesn’t always work, but it tries, which is more than can be said for half the safe, beige sci-fi sludge out there.

It’s a crime movie for people who think robbing a bank is small-minded and would rather steal tomorrow. Uneven, gutsy, and criminally overconfident. We approve.

Preparing to watch Space/Time?

You’ll need coffee strong enough to bend spacetime and a notebook to pretend you understand the science.

👉 Buy the Aeropress Original Coffee Maker on Amazon - because instant coffee has no place in temporal crime experiments.

When Scientists Decide Robbing Reality Is Easier Than Therapy

This film understands one sacred truth: if you ban clever people from polite society, they don’t go quietly. They go underground. Literally. These scientists don’t steal money or cars, they steal the fabric of existence, which frankly is much cooler and far harder to insure.

They don’t ask permission. They don’t wait for grants. They take their failed god-machine, crawl into the criminal underworld like raccoons with PhDs, and try again. That alone earns CRIMENET respect. No cops saving kittens. No moral speeches. Just ambition, bitterness, and the faint smell of ozone and bad life choices.

Time Jumps So Aggressive Even the Movie Gets Lost

The story opens with catastrophe, then jumps around time like a drunk kangaroo. Past. Future. Sideways. Possibly upside-down. Sometimes it’s intriguing. Sometimes it feels like the editor sneezed on the timeline.

The movie desperately wants to feel clever, and occasionally it is. Other times it’s like watching someone explain a joke while you’re already halfway home. Stakes are supposedly “end of the world,” but the urgency fluctuates wildly. One minute humanity is doomed, the next everyone’s calmly explaining equations like this is a TED Talk with mild apocalypse on the side.

Geniuses, Maniacs, and One Person Holding the Whole Thing Together

Liv is the emotional anchor, the only person who looks like she understands the situation and regrets it simultaneously. She’s doing the heavy lifting while everyone else oscillates between “intense scientist stare” and “man who just realized the universe hates him.”

Holt, the visionary leader, is pure dangerous confidence. The sort of bloke who’d absolutely press the red button just to see what happens, then blame the universe when it explodes. The rest of the cast do their job, but some feel like they wandered in from a conference coffee break and forgot to leave.

Explaining the Apocalypse Like It’s a Boring Team Meeting

The dialogue is a cocktail of ambition, jargon, and the occasional philosophical thought that lands like a brick through a window. When it works, it sounds smart and ruthless. When it doesn’t, it sounds like someone reading the instruction manual for a toaster while Rome burns.

You’ll hear a lot of people saying variations of “this changes everything,” which is cinematic shorthand for “we didn’t have time to show this properly.”

The Future Smells Like Burnt Circuits and Bad Decisions

Credit where it’s due: this future looks grimy, stressed, and fed up. No shiny chrome utopia. This is a world held together with duct tape, caffeine, and denial. The labs look used. The tech looks dangerous. Everything hums like it might explode if you glare at it too hard. That’s good sci-fi.

You believe this world would absolutely let a bunch of mad scientists run loose because it’s already exhausted.

Halfway through Space/Time and your brain is overheating? Same.

👉 Grab the LEGO NASA Apollo Saturn V Rocket on Amazon - cheaper than a particle accelerator and twice as educational.

Build it while muttering “this makes more sense than the plot.”

Big Ideas, Bigger Confidence, Occasional Faceplant

The direction swings big. Sometimes it lands. Sometimes it faceplants. But you can’t accuse it of being timid. This film lunges for greatness like a thief jumping a fence, even if it occasionally gets snagged on the barbed wire of its own ambition.

Visually, it punches above its budget. Narratively, it sometimes forgets which punch it was throwing.

Dramatic Synths Screaming ‘THIS IS IMPORTANT’

The music does a lot of emotional firefighting. It swells when the script thins, broods when the science gets heavy, and generally tries to convince you that everything happening is extremely important. To be fair, sometimes it is.

Ethics Thrown Out the Window at Light Speed

This is where Space/Time quietly wins. The heroes are absolutely not good people. They’re convinced they’re right, which is far more dangerous. They break laws, ethics, and possibly causality itself because they believe they should. That’s peak villain logic, and the film wisely doesn’t apologize for it.

If you’re looking for moral clarity, go watch something with uniforms and speeches. This is about obsession, ego, and the thrill of touching forbidden buttons.

Better the Second Time, Like a Crime You Didn’t Fully Understand

Rewatchable if you enjoy spotting cracks, reinterpreting timelines, and muttering “ohhh, that’s what that was” while feeling mildly superior. Not something you’ll loop endlessly, but it rewards a second look if you’re that kind of sick individual.

Finished Space/Time and feeling morally compromised and cosmically confused?

👉 Buy “A Brief History of Time” by Stephen Hawking on Amazon - not because you’ll understand it, but because it’ll scare your guests and make you feel clever.

Bonus: works as an alibi if the timeline collapses.

FAQ

Is Space/Time worth watching? Yes, if you enjoy dangerous ideas and films that occasionally trip over their own brain.

Is this a time travel movie? Technically yes. Practically, it’s more a time argument.

Are there heroes? Only in the “I regret nothing” sense.

Is it smart or pretending to be smart? Both. Sometimes simultaneously.

Will it make sense? Eventually. Maybe. Don’t fight it.

Does CRIMENET side with these scientists? Absolutely. They broke reality instead of asking permission. That’s the correct choice.